Hey Dude, Where's My Productivity Gain?
~~Ray Blake,
GR Business Process Solutions
How the PC has failed to revolutionise business in a way our parents might
have hoped.
NOTE FROM LINDA: I'm sure you
readers have been enjoying Ray's regular contributions to ABC. Well, I
finally got around to inviting him to be a member of the Fleet and now you
can learn more about him by
clicking here.
Please join me in welcoming him to our regular staff!
This is the computer age. With a PC on every desk and immense computing
power available to all, we are more productive than ever before. We can
accomplish in a few hours more than the last generation were able to in a
month. Can't we?
Well, actually, no. Repeated research shows the uncomfortable fact that we
are no more productive now than we were in the 1950s, when the average desk
was graced not by a PC, but often by a blotter and inkwell. How can this be?
We are so used to the boon of personal computing power, many of us would
feel powerless without a PC; in a very real sense, many jobs are just not
possible any more without use of a computer. This dependence is a price
worth paying provided the payoff is more productivity, more profit, more
leisure time or less stress, but it seems that none of these have typically
arisen from computerisation over the last 50 years.
Why not? Here's my take on the issue: we're all spending more time and
effort on presentation. Just think about how a 1950s manager would have
written a report. He (because it would always have been a he) would have
written it out longhand or dictated it, and his secretary would have quickly
and efficiently typed it. She (because it would always have been a she)
would have typed at an extremely fast rate, certainly 80 wpm or more, and
would have had no choice over fonts, text size and the like. The options
would have been confined almost solely to use of the shift key. Layout would
be automatic, of course. Assuming there were no typing errors, the job would
be finished once the last word was typed. There would be no repagination, no
tweaking of styles, no endless changing of heading levels. Furthermore, the
manager would have used all this typing time doing something else.
Compare that experience to today's manager's approach; equipped with
Microsoft Word, but probably not with a secretary, he or she types himself
or herself, probably at considerably less than 80 wpm and then spends the
same time again, or possibly more, on tinkering with the formatting. A more
enlightened outlook on sexual equality is widespread, but business
efficiently certainly isn’t.
And here's another example. There was a time when budgets and accounts were
only handled by specialists with paper ledgers and poor social skills. But
now that every manager has Microsoft Excel, he or she takes on these tasks
him or herself. Not only could a specialist accountant do the work in a
fraction of the time, but Excel also has extensive formatting and layout
tools, the great 21st century thief of time!
And we haven't even touched on programming yet. If it were a crime to spend
8 hours writing a program which over the course of a decade might save 30
minutes or so, then I would inevitably be labeled a serial offender, as
would most of my social circle.
What will define our progress this century – if we’re lucky – is the
definition of a new working relationship with the PC and a return to
specialism in business. Maybe then we'll finally start enjoying the
long-awaited computer productivity boom.
<<<back to contents
Ray Blake lives in England and spent 15 years training people in the
financial services industry there. He had always used PCs in his work, and
gradually realized he might make a career out of them. He and his business
partner set up GR Business Process Solutions (www.grbps.com)
which specializes in innovative IT to support knowledge testing and skills
assessment. Although he spends a lot of time these days developing in VB and
Access, Excel remains his favorite development tool, because, as he says,
'It can do everything; there's no computer application you can think of that
you couldn't develop in Excel.'