News and Reviews About Notebook Graphics Chips
~~ William Warren, Emmanuel Computer Consulting
Many people do not have the time or know where
to look for some great independent reviews and news about the latest in
computer hardware. I am hoping to remedy this by showing excerpts of
articles and showing links.Notebook graphics chips finally coming of age
Many who have notebooks and want to play games either know or are rudely
awakened to find that their on-board graphics can barely show Microsoft Word
much less do gaming. That is changing as the two graphics behemoths Nvidia
and ATI have released several new mobile chips. They perform on the lines of
each company’s mainstream desktop parts so now gaming is not an issue of
"Can I run PacMan?" but a whole new swath of games is now available to those
with the new generation notebooks. Here are a few links:
ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 reviewed: (this test also includes some desktop
cards and the comparable NVIDIA mobile part)
A Quick Summary:
With the launch of its new flagship mobile GPU,
the Mobility Radeon 9700, ATi has closed the 3D performance gap
between notebooks and comparably desktop systems even further. The
results make one thing unmistakably clear: A desktop PC with a year
old graphics card such as the Radeon 9600 can't hold a candle to
notebooks built around the Mobility Radeon 9700.
(Toms Hardware.com)
Anandtech's Mobility Radeon 9700 review:
So, the bottom line is: "does the M11 deserve the
Mobility Radeon 9700 name, which ATI has given it?" Based
on our results and experience with the M11 GPU, we would say
that the Mobility Radeon 9700 name is backed up well
enough. Though, we certainly won't disagree that ATI was
not helping itself with the Mobility Radeon 9600's three-tier naming
system.
On the performance end, we should make it clear that the Mobility
Radeon 9700 will provide performance increases in basically all
scenarios over the Mobility Radeon 9600 trio. This is a benefit from
the low-k process of the R360 core that the Mobility Radeon 9700 is
based upon.
In AA and AF settings, the Mobility Radeon 9700 will perform better
than the Mobility Radeon 9600 trio (in our case, an average of about
25%), but it will not increase its performance margin or shorten its
performance degradation when resolutions are increased. For example,
if you are playing Jedi Academy with a Mobility Radeon 9600 GPU (in
any of its derivatives) and you turn on AA and AF or increase the
resolution, the degrade margin you get from the higher settings will
basically be the same for the Mobility Radeon 9700 GPU (assuming the
platform is the same). This is because the number of pipes and
architecture between M10 and M11 is very similar.
(anandtech.com, author: Andrew Ku)
Not everyone cares or wants the latest in graphics hardware. There are
"older" versions of both ATI and NVIDIA’s parts, as well as the Mobility
Radeon 9000 and NVIDIA’s GeForce4 440 Go, which are previous generation
parts:
Anandtech’s Mobility Radeon 900 and Nvidia GeForce4 440 Go Review :
Summary:
ATI is really pushing the envelope on video cards with the
announcement of the Mobility Radeon 9000. Not only does the chip
bring to market some needed speed and features, it is also available
in notebook systems as of today. Both of these aspects of the
Mobility Radeon 9000 make it the mobile graphics chip of choice
today as well as the foreseeable future. Let's go over a bit of what
we learned.
First off, in many gaming situations the Mobility Radeon 9000 is
able to offer substantial performance increases over the GeForce4
440 Go, on the order of around 20-25%. In others benchmarks, like
two specific levels in Unreal Tournament 2002 and in at least one
level of Serious Sam 2, the performance increase is not so
pronounced (5-10%). The times that the performance difference is
pronounced can mean the difference between playing a game smooth or
choppy at a high resolution. The times when the performance
difference is not as large, you are still left with the highest
performing mobile GPU available, although by a fairly trivial
amount.
Secondly, the largest advantage that the Mobility Radeon 9000 has
over its competitors is its DirectX 8.1 compatibility. The
introduction of pixel and vertex shaders is a huge step forward for
the mobile community and further closes the gap between desktops and
notebooks. DirectX 8 compatibility is necessary if you wish to play
the games of tomorrow and since a laptop video chip can't just be
swapped out for a new one, getting the best mobile GPU on the market
at the time of purchase is very important if you like your 3D games.
(Anandtech.com, author: Matthew.Witheiler)
What does this come down to? When buying a notebook make sure to find out
exactly which graphics chip is in the machine. There is no reason to accept
sub-standard graphics performance when buying a notebook anymore; especially
considering that there are even "older" versions of everything mentioned
here, namely the Mobility Radeon
7500. So if the graphics do not say GeForce Go or Mobility Radeon, I
would seriously re-evaluate your purchase if you plan to do anything other
than office applications on your notebook. William Warren is a 20-year veteran of the
computer industry. He is completely self-taught, having no formal training,
but taught himself through reading and hands-on experience. His main focus
is computer/networking hardware, installation, and repair, as well as
network and computer security. He is also the owner of a soon-to-be-live
startup computer consulting firm, Emmanuel Computer Consulting,
http://www.emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com, which does
computer/network/security consulting for residences and businesses in the
Frederick/Brunswick, Maryland area.
email: hescominsoon@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com
<<<back to contents |